Racism: Cure or Coverup the politics of Anti-Racism

If you’re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.” — Malcolm X

Guys, you cannot end racism. The only thing we try to do is limit its power. And you do not limit its power by curbing freedom of speech. You curb it by presenting stronger positions and greater moral arguments. If we have to police our very speech until landminds are seen as less dangerous, then we are destroying the fundamental right to debate. I have a very, very strong sense of justice. I hate injustice, but living next to that, I love freedom of speech and do not believe there should be any taboo on what we explore in the intellectual space. We might have to make the case as human beings, do the rules apply to some or everyone? And what does it say when, in the name of “ending racism,” we punish people opposing a racist genocide? Gaslighting the world into believing that feelings matter more than human lives.

It is only wrong when people attack people like me, then I am not defending a principle, I am defending a group interest — Tucker Carlson

When Racism dresses up in anti-racist rhetoric to be more effective at pushing racism

I have read in almost every single Western newspaper about Rising Antisemitism, the death toll on this rising antisemitism is usually single digits (UK), early double digits(Australia). Yet let us look at Rising Islamophobia. Where can I read about that obvious reality? Of all the cases of racism against African people, I cannot even say it is rising since it has been a constant over the centuries. I was blocked from commenting on MSN while vile racism against Africans was allowed. So, when antiracism is assymetrical it is not actually anti-racism, it is politics.

Palestinians are told the words we use dwarf the decades of violence enacted against us by the self-proclaimed Jewish State. A drone is one thing, but a trope—a trope is unacceptable. No more.— Mohammed El-Kurd

You cannot fix racism by trying to cover it with pretty paint. Something very real fuels racism. And 7/10 it is some sense, real or imagined, of inequity between groups. Where we see one group get red carpet service and baby handled, and other groups are ignored.

Why cant we all just get along (under White supremacy)

So the more I read about so-called rising antisemitism, the more I see an agenda, and the less interested I am in their stuff. I honestly can’t stand to hear about antisemitism. So when anti-racist groups (ADL, Stopantisemitism, etc) are racist, then clearly racism is just the new system of control. It has nothing to do with stopping racism!

This nonsense no longer works. And the comments reflect a loss of narrative. Why not teach about the history of Australian colonialism first? Why is the history of 0.4% of the population so dominant? Always in the news, always being discussed? When we keep reading these rubbish solutions about teaching more Jewish history, people get angry at their chosen status and need for special treatment, while committing genocide. If I want to learn about the Holocaust, I just watch what Jews are doing in Israel, we dont need to travel back to 1940s Poland, it is 4K right now in Gaza. So you get tired of them! And the more of this, the more tired one gets. So to hell with the other history of people who have suffered and still suffer way more than Jews. They have spat on their Holocaust by not learning that ” Never again means Never again period.

 

But it is not that easy. Because in a woke world, you are policing people and their experiences and asking them to dismiss reality and swallow woke

So every day we see that the above statement is characteristic of Jewish people, not all, but it is a characteristic of the ones who call themselves “Jewish friend of labor”, “Stop antisemitism”, “Jewish federation of North America”, “AIPAC”, “ADL”, I do not think any ethnic group has more representation that Jews. And they are vocally Jewish, so we must trust them when they say:

So so-called “Anti-racism” is to protect Zionists and assist Jewish domination as just a coincidence. No longer are we allowed to say “Jews control the media” after we just saw them do just that and boast about it. We cannot call them out after they threatened South Africa with their economic withdrawal because they own so much of the SA economy; no, we have anti-racism to shut down that observation. Nia means purpose, and what is the primary purpose of most of these “Anti-racist” campaigns? Dont let the token additions of Blacks and Asians distract you.

ISLAMOPHOBIA IS POWERLESS

So as to protect the existence of special protection for Jews, we have special protection for Muslims, or at least the appearance of that. But how many people have been fired for Islamophobia? How many times has anyone felt foul of its definition and suffered consequences? So the power distribution is asymmetrical.

RELIGIOUS SHIELDS FOR RACISM

I remember when the mosque in Finsbury Park was closed down because the Muslims were using it to plan and plot “terrorism”.  We can understand why that would be a problem at face value. But we can also understand that a mosque is a political space, as Islam is inherently, to be Islam, means to be political. There is no separation. I know some pertend they should be, but that has never in the history of humanity ever happened. The Pope, by being the Pope, is 100% political.

Jewish Synagogues are being used as a cover for GenocideNow. When Jews get together in a synagogue and start selling land the IDF stole, what should we do? Now, when that genocide supporting structure is attacked, what will the news say? Antisemitism, aka targeting Jews because they are Jewish. But what were they using the synagogue for? Religion or genocide? So racism is protected by “anti-racism” policies. Jews use their religion as a shield to commit genocide. But they claim Hamas uses civilian buildings, schools, etc, to launch attacks on Israel. But they use religious structures to push genocide.

I CAN THINK WITH MY MOUTH SHUT

Putting a cap on people’s lips has done nothing to change people’s hearts; if anything, it makes people even more antisemitic. It confirms the very stereotype they are telling us is antisemitic. Jews do not control the media; it is antisemitic according to the media they control. Let the BBC step out of line and see which group can get them to apologize. But it is not controlled.

Remember, Ms. Rachel is antisemite of the year. So if the nicest person on Earth who loves kids is racist, then what value does the word racism have?

DEI

Anti-Racism is sometimes a good cover for Racism. Makes sense? ADL is “anti-racism,” yet are a racist organization. You see, if your anti-racism is racist in selecting who are victims of racism, then it is just another form of racism. Stop antisemitism is a classic example, where anti-racism is the cover for deep Zionist racism.

All these Negros tell you that they have issues with DEI, like Negro Zionist Wesley Hunt. Does he know what DEI stands for? Yet he secured his position based on being a black Zionist and an agent for White Supremacy.  Many argue that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives weaken meritocracy by focusing on identity over ability. This argument assumes that merit is neutral and always rewarded in fair systems. In reality, biases, structural inequalities, and flawed evaluations often prevent genuine meritocracy. Rather than undermining merit, DEI helps correct these distortions.
Yet DEI is flagged as racism. Funny that. Affirmative action is isolated from the history of systemic racism, assumes everything was always equal, and declares Affirmative Action and BEE(South Africa) racist. So you see what I mean by so-called anti-Racism can be another form of RACISM! But we dont look at what people say or put on their offices or in the brochures, we look at the consequences of their actions.

And it has become popular these days to strawman positions to campaign against. Like Shariah law, and then someone asked what specific Shariah law they were targeting to get rid of in the first place (silence). You mean banning Halal food, or Jummah? Like CRT in baby schools (any examples of CRT in kids’ schools?), so these are false flags. The manufacturing of problems to then appear to solve.

IT DIDN’T GO AWAY

For all the rainbows advertised as a feature of South Africa, the racism did not go away. If anything, it is merely a rift within society, albeit one that is more discreet. They might put the photo of Mandela on their wall, but their economics is all white. Their attitudes to economic integration have not changed. They are just more polite in public about how they really feel about Zulus and other “blacks.” Their land ownership stays the same. They just created the DA, a revamped apartheidesq political party.

WHEN IS IT RACISM

Language was more of a minefield than the border between Syria and the occupied Golan Heights, and we, children at the time, were expected to hop around them, hoping we don’t accidentally step on an explosive trope that would discredit us. — Kurd

Not everything that is filed as racism is actually racism. And it is a fine line. When it comes to Africans and all the racist shit they say about us, I STILL ask “But is it true?”. And what is the intent (Nia).

Africans have a lower IQ than other races

Africans have higher rates of HIV

Africans have the poorest continent

The NBA and Rap music is dominanted by black people

Black people love music

Blacks have a lot of missing dads

Blacks are not into education

Blacks do not like marriage

Which of the above is racism

How about Blacks sold Black people into slavery?

Blacks waste their money on hair and other fleeting things.

(but nothing above applies to all of us).

Have we hit some racism yet?

I do not like Kanye, but when pressed, Kanye pulled out his phone and showed you Jews and media ownership. Would it be antisemitic to say Israel is run by Jewish Supremacists? You know Australia and UK just buckled to pressure from Jewish organizations over curbing free speech critical of Israel. Bari Weis and Larry Ellison are taking over the media. But dont listen to me, read what they (The Jews) said. Yes, they call themselves Jews, so what must I call them?

ISLAMOPHOBIA FUNDED BY ZIONIST JEWS

The exact people who say Antisemitism is rising. But what this video does not cover is if they are running Islamophobia in Christian circles, what do you think they are doing in African circles? In hotep and Afrocentric circles? Who is seeding our community with the Arab Slave trade and Islam’s cutting of black boys’ balls? Well, you ask us as we have a full report on that.

There is a lot of anti-African hatred in North Africa and many parts of the Arab world. But we need context for that. Remember, something can be true, but first ask what its purpose is. Why are Black rednecks saying Palestinians are racist towards Afro-Palestinians? Is it true? It is way less true than the racism you will experience as an African foreigner in South Africa. Being denied medical attention or education, with the threat of violence and destruction of property a daily occurrence.

Racism vs observations.

I have no problem with people using their free speech to speak about African people. If it is true, is it still racism? Maybe if the intent is to harm or put down. Everyone, including Trump, knows the statement below is true. Then what is the difference between racism and stating the obvious? Especially when they are the ones saying it!

I want to STOP racism, I really do. But I cannot deny that different groups have different traits– that is reality. My own group included. We have some good things and some bad things. Muslims have issues also. If everything negative is filed as racism, then what happens to the conversation? Is it racist to make statements based on stats for African Americans? Clearly not. Then why is making statements based on blatantly Jewish control antisemitism, or is Israel not Jewish-controlled? How can we sit here and look at each other and deny that most of the stereotypes of Jewish people are false!

Come on now, you see it played out in front of you, but then in comes the so-called anti-racism to stymie a discussion about it. Zulus and all the stereotypes about them are not rooted in Narnia; they are rooted in lived experiences. They have certain Zulu person traits, not all of them good. Ethiopians are extremely suspicious and stubborn people. If you live in Ethiopia, you see this every day. It is very true! How do we deal with these opposing things? Reality vs so-called anti-racism.

And this is why it doesn’t work, because people will just go and read Mein Kampf for themselves and say, “But wait a moment, Hitler’s argument was not wrong. ” How do you reconcile this now? We might not say it openly for fear of being called an antisemite, but everyone is still thinking it. You have not cured the world of Hitler (maybe that is why he is still so popular), you just covered it up.

Using money to force people into a Zionist position only causes more antisemitism. Buying up Google search only reinforces the tropes. Because now we are seeing that the tropes are justified. You cannot have your cake and eat it too. They say he hated the Jews because of jealousy, I agree, and what else? I have searched, and the jealousy argument is not 1/2 of it. The more they cover it up, the more people return to Jews control the world tropes. It is like when Bush attacked Iraq and said, “They hate our freedoms.” He skipped over 90% of history and simplified it for the dullards as “they hate our freedom. Would I be wrong to ask for an honest conversation? The same way everyone is being honest about slavery in Africa and the Arab world?

It is the same crisis “Black” people find themselves in with this woke business. Controlling the conversation, and then there is the reality when you look out your window, which brings me to.

ARE STATS RACIST?

ALL the energy goes to the Jews. I dont think this is how we stop racism. It will never work. It tries to stop racism by policing freedom of speech. Now, 80% of the people who put on a show for African Americans and Jews go home in private with even more racist beliefs in their heads. The more you silence people speaking, the more the racist resentment grows. You never stopped racism. You just covered it up!

SELECTIVE OUTRAGE, NOT PRINCIPLED

The point of what is morally reprehensible is best illustrated here. Dana Bash, a Jew, has a principled position against hate speech; she complains that Tucker did not rein in Nick Fuentes when he interviewed him. Yet she interviewed Randy Fine, one of the most hateful Islamophobic Jewish bigots in office, and she had no moral objections then. So her morality is not pricplied, it is political.